|
Georgia
Friends of Midwives
What is GFOM?
Georgia Friends
of Midwives is a consumer group concerned with issues surrounding the
problem of very limited birthing choices in our state.
GFOM was
formed in 1990 in response to legal and political challenges to Georgia's
midwifery community. We advocate the preservation of safe, accessible
and affordable childbirth alternatives as exemplified by the Midwives
Model of Care™, including midwife-attended birth at home
and in birth centers.
Our Mission
Our
beliefs:
 |
Research
shows conclusively that for most women a planned, midwife-attended
birth at home or in a birth center is at least as safe as birth in
a hospital. |
 |
The
Midwifery Model of Care results in excellent birth outcomes as well
as deeply meaningful and satisfying family birth experiences.
|
 |
Fair
regulation of direct-entry midwifery benefits both consumers and midwives.
|
 |
Certified
Professional Midwives (CPMs), credentialed by the North American Registry
of Midwives (NARM), should be able to legally practice in Georgia
as they can in 33 other states.
|
 |
Midwife-attended
home birth should be a real and accessible choice for Georgia families
who, for any of a variety of reasons, prefer the home birth alternative.
|
Our
purpose:
 |
To
promote awareness and public education regarding direct entry midwifery
and the Certified Professional Midwife credential, and to ensure that
the Midwifery Model of Care is available to all. |
General Information about Midwifery
Certified
nurse-midwives (CNMs) are licensed health care practitioners educated
in the two disciplines of nursing and midwifery. They provide primary
health care to women of childbearing age including: prenatal care, labor
and delivery care, care after birth, gynecological exams, newborn care,
assistance with family planning decisions, preconception care, menopausal
management and counseling in health maintenance and disease prevention.
The CNM practices within a health care system that provides for consultation,
collaborative management or referral as indicated by the health status
of the client. This collegial relationship with physicians allows many
hospital-based CNMs the ability to care for women with a wide variety
of risk factors and obstetrical needs. While the majority of CNMs deliver
in hospital settings, some CNMs also work with low-risk clients independently
in birth center or homebirth practices. CNMs now deliver 9% of all babies
born in the US
The majority of CNMs are educated in programs within institutions of higher
education leading to a Masters Degree, and this has become the current
standard of nurse-midwifery education. CNMs are certified through the
American College of Midwives Certification Council (ACC) and practice
legally in all states.
Direct-entry
midwives (DEMs) practice legally in approximately 34 states, with
licensure available in 20 states. Direct-entry midwives are independent
practitioners educated in the discipline of midwifery through self-study,
apprenticeship, formal midwifery school, or a college- or university-based
program distinct from the discipline of nursing. A direct-entry midwife
is trained to provide care to healthy women and newborns throughout the
childbearing cycle primarily in out-of-hospital settings.
States that provide licensure for DEMs vary in their requirements. Most
require the midwife be certified through The North American Registry of
Midwives (NARM) as a Certified Professional Midwife (CPM), although some
still have their own requirements in place. All states which credential
(or license) DEMs, with the exception of New York, use the NARM Written
Exam as their state licensing exam.
Efforts are
underway in many states to make the CPM credential the basis of licensure,
or a route to licensure for direct-entry midwives who practice predominantly
in out-of-hospital settings. The CPM credential was created in 1994 by
and for midwives. It recognizes a broad range of educational pathways,
is competency based, and requires out-of-hospital birth experience. Practice
is based on the Midwives Model of Care. For more information about
the CPM, go to the mission statement of the North
American Registry of Midwives or contact them via email.
A good source
of information is the Citizens
for Midwifery.
Direct-Entry Midwifery in Georgia - A
Brief History
From colonial
days to the present, Georgia families have been served by community-based
midwives delivering infants safely within the comfort and security of
their own homes. Mothers and babies have been cared for during
pregnancy, birth and postpartum regardless of race, financial status,
religion, or geographical location. Home birth was particularly
prevalent in the rural areas of Georgia where hospitals and physicians
have always been and continue to be inaccessible to many families.
Today, the high cost of hospital-based physician care and the lack of
health insurance for many working families lends new urgency to the midwife-attended
home birth alternative in both urban and rural settings. In Georgia,
there are currently no licensed health care providers openly attending
home births.
| 1955
- |
Lay
Midwifery Act: Georgia Department of Human Resources (DHR) to set
educational requirements and certify lay midwives |
| 1960's
- |
DHR
stops certifying midwives |
| 1980's
- |
New
direct entry midwives request certification but are told none is available
|
| 1990
- |
Home
birth infant death prompts proposal to make midwifery a felony; stopped
in committee by midwifery activists |
| 1991
- |
DHR
establishes Task Force to write new Rules and Regulations for certification
|
1991
(July 17) - |
New
Public Health Director disbands Task Force, establishes new "emergency"
Rules and Regulations setting the Certified Nurse Midwife credential
as the educational requirement, and initiates process for these to
become new permanent Rules and Regulations |
1991
(August 28) - |
Public
hearing on Rules attended by more than 100 citizens protesting new
Rules |
1991
(November) - |
New
Rules made permanent |
1992
(February) - |
Citizens
file Petition for Judicial Review; judge upholds DHR's actions |
| 1992
- |
Rep.
Bill Dover sponsors and introduces bill to legalize direct entry midwives
|
| 1993
& 1995 - |
Rep.
Roger Byrd sponsors and introduces a bill calling for the DHR to certify
CPMs (Certified Professional Midwives) |
| 1997
- |
Rep.
Barbara Mobley sponsors and reintroduces the bill |
| 1999
- |
Rep.
Mobley introduces a resolution
for the study of the CPM credential. |
| 2000
-Feb. 14 |
HR
32 unanimously passed the full House on Feb. 14, 2000, to go into
effect on July 1, 2000. However, because the Speaker of the
House never did appoint the Study Committee the resolution died. |
| 2001-2002
|
Representative
Mobley reintroduced the resolution, now designated as HR 128. The
bill was sent to the Rules Committee where it will remain until Rules
Committee Chair Representative Calvin Smyre and his Committee move
to send it to the House for a vote. |
| Current
Status - |
As
of 2003 the practice of direct entry midwives is technically a misdemeanor.
A number of these midwives are practicing, mostly in the metro Atlanta
area. However, no direct entry midwife has been investigated,
charged, or convicted since 1991. Most midwives practicing in GA hold
national ceritifcation through the North American Registry of Midwives
(NARM). This credential and/or exam is recognized in every state that
certifies direct-entry midwives with the exception of New York and
Rhode Island.
To
our knowledge, no CNMs have ever attempted to be certified as lay
midwives under the present law and none attend home births in Georgia.
There is only one freestanding birth center, which is just outside
of Savannah.
|
Did You Know?
 |
The
US ranks 25th internationally in infant mortality (National Center
for Health Statistics, 1993)
|
 |
All
the European countries with perinatal and infant mortality rates lower
than that of the United States use midwives as the sole birth attendant
for at least 70% of all births. (Suarez, S.H.; Midwifery is Not the
Practice of Medicine, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 5,
2 1993)
|
 |
From
$13 billion to $20 billion a year could be saved in health care costs
by developing midwifery care, demedicalizing childbirth, and encouraging
breastfeeding. (Frank A. Oski MD, Professor and Director, Department
of Pediatrics, John Hopkins University School of Medicine)
|
 |
The
average cost of an uncomplicated physician-attended hospital birth
in Georgia is more than $5,000, with a cesarean delivery costing $12,000
or more (for those without insurance). The total cost of midwife-attended
home birth is less than $2000, and the chance of a midwife's client
needing a cesarean is less than 4 percent.
|
 |
Some
insurance companies will cover midwife-attended home birth.
|
 |
Midwives
are the most cost effective and appropriate primary care givers for
all childbearing women in all instances and in all settings. (World
Health Organization Report on Health Promotion and Birth, 1986).
|
 |
Today,
only 6% of US births are attended by midwives. (National Center for
Health Statistics, 1995).
|
 |
Midwives
provide excellent personalized care, with each visit averaging 45-60
minutes and including nutritional counseling, in addition to the usual
tests and analyses. Midwives emphasize the responsibility of
the mother to lead a healthy lifestyle, and continuously apply risk
screening criteria to ensure that only those women determined to be
low-risk proceed with plans for a midwife-attended home birth.
|
 |
Many
Georgian families desire to have an unhampered, family-centered birth
at home, whether for personal, religious, cultural, or economic reasons.
Georgia Friends of Midwives estimates that there are between
500 and 700 home births in Georgia each year. |
Midwives Model of Care™
The Midwives
Model of Care is based on the fact that pregnancy and birth are normal
life events. The Midwives Model of Care includes:
 |
Monitoring
the physical, psychological, and social well-being of the mother throughout
the childbearing cycle;
|
 |
Providing
individualized education, counseling and prenatal care, continuous
hands-on assistance during labor and delivery, and postpartum support
|
 |
Minimizing
technological interventions; and
|
 |
Identifying
and referring women who require obstetrical attention. |
The application
of this model has been proven to reduce the incidence of birth injury,
trauma, and cesarean section.
Copyright
© 1996-2001, Midwifery Task Force All Rights Reserved
|